Shortly earlier than his assassination, Charlie Kirk and CNN host Van Jones publicly sparred over the killing of Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Van Jones recollects what occurred, right here in his own words:
He mentioned the grotesque killing of a White lady by a Black man was motivated solely by anti-White hatred. I denounced those comments on CNN as unfounded. He went on TV and denounced MY denunciation. Then he unleashed a firehose of tweets, difficult my argument.
Kirk’s pushback sparked a web based torrent of racist dying threats towards me, the likes of which I’ve hardly ever seen.
Issues had been critically heading off the rails.
Then — in the course of all this — Charlie Kirk reached out.
The message Kirk despatched to Van Jones was this:
Then Van Jones says: “Sadly, earlier than I might even reply, Charlie Kirk was killed — seemingly assassinated for the phrases he’s spoken.” Jones then goes on to speak about how each Kirk and himself valued free speech, debate, and civility regardless of sharp disagreements. And reminded us that pundits usually argue fiercely however don’t want one another hurt.
It’s a clever message that exhibits two individuals from reverse political camps respecting one another, not wishing hurt, however merely searching for a wholesome debate of concepts.
